Good High Yield Dividend Stocks Are Better Alternatives to Bonds Today

The markets continue to be volatile.

With the European countries still struggling to figure their way out of the debt mess, and even the well regarded bank like JP Morgan taking large losses on their hedging activities, it is understandable that some investors may decide move their assets to the relative safety of the bonds.

However, this safety is illusory.

The Inverse Relationship Between Bonds and Interest Rates

This is one of the fundamental principle of bond investing.  It is well understood but still bears repeating.

The value of a bond goes up when the interest rates are low and it goes down when the interest rates are high.

We are currently in a low interest rate environment and there is not much lower the interest rates can go.

In fact, there is every likelihood that the interest rates will be raised as the economy gets on a sounder footing.  Given this, if you buy bonds now (either directly or through a bond fund), you are not only paying a high price for the bond, but you are also locking in a smaller yield.

As interest rates go up, your bonds will lose value while your yield will not change (in a bond fund, your yield will rise slowly as the fund sells older bonds and buys new ones, but then you will realize capital losses along the way).

Return of the Junk Bonds

high yield dividend stocks vs bonds

High yield dividend stocks may be a better alternative to bonds in today’s economy.

The hunt for the yield has grown so feverish that the junk bonds are now seeing renewed interest.

This is typically a sign that many companies have trouble accessing credit through normal channels (banking) and have to submit to high coupon junk issuance.

Continues After Advertisement




As a result, many bond funds have junk debt mixed in their portfolio to juice up their yield to attract retail investors.  Junk bonds carry much higher default risk and are seldom a sensible investment.

If you are a bond fund investor, you should pay special attention to the investment grades that your fund is invested in.

As and when the economy becomes more conducive to accessing capital markets, there is also a risk that a great number of companies will flood the markets with their bonds as they finally start to expand and undertake capital expenditures.

Greater supply of bonds mean pricing pressure on the value of the bonds.

Equity Markets Offer Alternatives to Bonds

The European quagmire has dampened the equity market in the US and as a result the market has not kept pace with the improvement in the business fundamentals.

This can be seen much more clearly with the small and mid cap companies where it is not hard to find dividend yields of 3% or higher.  These high yielding dividend stocks offer a great alternative to investing in bonds with the possibility of price appreciation as well, particularly if the stock is still fairly undervalued on most valuation metrics and the underlying business is sound and profitable.

If you worry about inflation returning to the economy (and I believe that interest rates and inflation will go up together), stocks are even more attractive.

Stocks generally do better as an asset class than bonds in an inflationary environment as the value of the business assets rise.

Your Asset Allocation Should also Adapt to the Economic Environment

If you follow the financial planning advice that is most often offered, you have probably set up your bond exposure to increase as you get closer to the retirement.

While this is typically a good advice, it does not take into account the fact that the economic conditions may be different for you, compared to say, someone who retired 10 years ago.

You should always temper your asset allocation strategy with the economic realities.  Blindly selling stocks when they are low and buying bonds when they are high is not prudent.

About the Author: Shailesh Kumar is the founder of Value Stock Guide where he offers stock recommendations using value investing principles.

Published or updated March 29, 2013.

Comments

  1. Good post, but I would disagree to a point with the guest poster. While he is correct on the from a pure yield perspective, the risk profile of stocks vs. bonds is radically different. Before moving to a heavier stock concentration to chase yield I would caution any investor to look at what this does to the risk profile of their portfolio. While dividend paying stocks MIGHT lose less in a major down market, they will likely still take a hit. The trade off for a bit of extra yield might not be worth the risk of a major hit to their principal in a market drop (such as 2008-09). In my humble opinion asset allocation is first about risk control.

    • Glen, Thanks for the opportunity to post.

      @Roger,
      I argue that bonds are more risky than stocks today as they are almost guaranteed to lose you money over the next few years.

      I know traditional financial planning asserts that possibility that the value may move up or down (volatility) is risk, and according to this definition, a guarantee that you will steadily lose money is not risk. I disagree with that definition.

      Best,
      Shailesh

      • @Shailesh Your points are well taken. A few thoughts based on my almost 15 years in this business:

        -When people say things are different this time, they aren’t. Believing that often leads to horrible investment results.
        -There are few vehicles that will provide the level of income that bond investors were able to get a few years ago with any degree of safety.
        -Investors have to decide what role(s) bonds will play in their portfolio. I generally use them first as a diversifier away from stocks and as part of the portfolio’s risk profile. In some cases, since the last market downturn, I have made a fair amount of gain for clients with certain bond funds and closed end funds. But overall I use fixed income as a diversifier. On the fund side I’ve moved to a decidedly lower duration profile.
        -Laddering of individual bonds remains a solid strategy as well. Everything you say above is true, however for many investors as we move forward this is an effective way to manage their bond portfolio assuming they can and will hold to maturity. The length of the ladder can be managed, etc.
        -With an active (and competent) bond fund manager you are paying for their skill in buying and selling to manage interest rate risk and duration. The good ones will do this and earn their fees over the next few years.

        I’m not saying that you are wrong, but to see yield seeking investors make a significant move into stocks to gain 100 or even 200 basis points of yield scares the heck out of me. Maybe it really is different this time, but I have rarely if ever seen a “bond crash” as severe as the types of stock market downturns we saw in 2000-02 and 2008-09.

What Do You Think?

*

Free Newsletter to Keep you Free From Broke!Name: Email: We respect your email privacyPowered by AWeber email marketing